Monday, July 2, 2007

On Being a Skeptical Believer

An ongoing battle of mine is that of faith and reason. Six or seven years ago I questioned whether or not I would still be a Christian by now. I struggled with this because years ago I let go of my fairy tale understanding of Bible stories, that I acquired in Sunday school. Back in those days I was obsessed with Superman, Spiderman and others, but in reality I knew that super powers were make believe... except in Bible times. Thousands of years ago God broke open the sky and talked audibly to people. There were real super heroes that had real super powers and their names were Samson, Moses, Jesus and his disciples. And God was the biggest super hero of all, He could just think things into existence. He would say the word and a universe would instantaneously appear. The world, at one time, was a magical place, complete with talking animals and giants.

I don't mean to be disrespectful. I mean to point out a way that many Christians, including myself, grew up thinking about the Bible, and, in many ways, I think that some of those Christians go on thinking this way. When we get older we realize that Abraham Lincoln and George Washington weren't perfect, shiny role models. They were EFFed up humans, that lied, were racist, got depressed and scared just like all of us. But, at some point, we realize that things back then are a lot like they are today; and that our child-like understanding of these men were fairy tales. But for some reason, I don't think that some Christians make this transition with the Bible. They retain a fairy tale understanding.

This defairytalization of the Bible is something I am constantly wrestling with. I grew up in a pentecostal church where "miracles" were commonplace, as were anecdotes about miracles. After researching the "behavior" I grew up with, I've come to the conclusion that a lot of it is a form of hypnosis. It also seems that much of what is labeled as demonic, supernatural etc. such as talking to the dead, auras and other weird stuff are easily debunked and/or are psychosomatic. This has seriously jaded me when it comes to accepting the supernatural. In fact, I don't really believe in the supernatural as it is commonly defined.

I think God does things that are beyond our comprehension, but I think it's totally in the realm of what is possible. God exists in all dimensions. Like the two dimensional flatlanders we have a very limited comprehension of reality, and God could interact with us in ways that are perfectly with in the bounds of what is natural; we just can't understand it. Furthermore, I think that if we went back in time and witnessed some of the miracles in the Bible we might find that the Israelites were witnessing natural phenomena. For instance, Sinai sounds very much like an active volcano. In the desert there exists gas pockets under the sand. When people are walking in the desert they sometimes step on these gas pockets, and when these gas pockets erupt they fling sand that causes tiny sparks. The sparks ignite the pocket and create a pillar of fire. I'm not saying that I think these are the explanations for these miracles; only that it's a possibility. Also, just because it's a natural occurrence doesn't mean that God didn't plan it that way. It just sounds more realistic that God used nature to give his chosen people victory over Egypt rather than magic.

What I know is that God is real, and that Jesus is the incarnation. I do believe that God heals people, and that He is constantly involved with His creation. I also believe that the Bible was written by ancient people with an ancient worldview, and while it is inspired, God did not edit out the way his people viewed reality. The Bible wasn't written specifically for 21st century American Christians, it doesn't cater to our science-based understanding of the natural world, and it certainly isn't a fairy tale. It really happened, I don't know how, but that's were my faith begins.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

"efairytalization?" I'm going to have to start using that word! :)

Keep writing man, you're so articulate! Love the post bro.

Anonymous said...

I would agree with you. What I find interesting is if you watch the history channel they like to do
segments on bible stories. they are always trying to explain everything from a science perspective. For instance I watched a whole segment on Noah's fload. They were trying to prove from science that a flood really could have happened but it did not flood the entire earth just Mesopotania region.( I can not spell!) I think some times our huma n minds can not grasp the concept if God said something happened than it happened and some times Science does not have to prove it. It hard thought because that is were our faith starts!

Anonymous said...

Interestingly enough did you see they just found a channel at the bottom of the Red Sea that has chariots and sandals and other weapons of war found there? They have no idea how they would have gotten there. Hmmmm, now where did I hear something about that?

chris o said...

Could you cite your source there buddy? You aren't talking about the pseudo-archaeologist Ron Wyatt are you?
Don't get me wrong, I would love it if Noah's ark was discovered, or if Lot's wife was found, or if and entire Egyptian army was discovered at the bottom of the Red Sea, or even if a giraffe, a collie and a brontasaurus were all found in the same rock layer. My faith would be bolsterd, but I guess my point is that I don't need to believe in the Charleton Heston version of the Red Sea crossing. God is still real, the Bible is still his word, and the Exodus was still a mighty victory even if the Israelites crossed at the shallower "sea of reeds" like most scholars think. God meets us where we are, and if he gave his people the freedom to write down his story in a mythical/poetic style that was characteristic of ANE culture then so be it.

Anonymous said...

I'll site mine if you rephrase your "most scholars" to "some" scholars. Actually, that's not true. I will say it isn't that guy that you mentioned, who I've never heard of. I found it pretty easy. Well, a friend sent me the link, but still....:)
And why do you have word verification on? How many spam comments do you get?

Anonymous said...

P.S.
Why would they have crossed in "the shallow end" (was there a lifeguard) on "dry" ground? Or do you not believe that word is in the Hebrew? Which is cool, except that I disagree but...ok, off to bed.

Anonymous said...

Ok, I think it was a disciple of this guy you named. Who seems to be a fraud so there goes that. Although this guy does seem to have pictures. Which of course can be fabricated. Either way, I think we may have stumbled onto a fun discussion.
:O

Anne said...

You guys are funny, why can't anyone of you spell?? haha.... =P

p.s. I thought that blogs always did that word verification thing?

Anonymous said...

anne,
Your's doesn't. :)

chris o said...

Why are you posting anonymously?

I'll change my "most scholars" to a lot of scholars. Go here http://www.crivoice.org/yamsuph.html to more fully understand what I mean by the "sea of reeds" comment. I've heard Paul Maier discuss this interpretation as well.

Ron Wyatt represents exactly the kind of thinking I'm getting at in this post. The fact is,is none of his "discoveries" have been published in any sort of peer reviewed journal, nor do any scholars give them any sort of credence. Some Christians cling to these hoaxes because they have such a narrow understanding of truth, and they want their flannel graph versions of these stories to be vindicated.

I do believe that a historical crossing occurred, but I do not believe that to be the point of the story. Once again, read the article I linked to above for a theological interpretation as well as a culturally contextual one. I think that interpretation makes much more sense.

Finally, I didn't know I could turn word verification off, but being that it blocks spam, I think I'll keep it on.

Anonymous said...

Because I'm lazy. and tab doesn't take me from my name to my blog like it does on firefox. :(
I seriously had never heard of this Wyatt fellow (who I've now discovered is dead) before you.